FF6
#41
Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:51 AM
Final Fantasy VI is not about Kefka. Kefka's impact on the plot could have been filled by any character who thought to steal the powers by moving a statue. What if Gestahl had moved the statue and taken the power? Would the game have been significantly different? What if a random soldier did it? Not only that, but his madness does have a reason. His background easily could have been explained in the normal course of the game, but they relegated that information to a random NPC you could easily miss talking to. Honestly, if his background info had been more woven into the story of the game, I think he would have been a better villain.
- Twistificent, ShinGamix and Schneider like this
#42
Posted 11 January 2012 - 11:24 AM
- War of the Souls Currently: Chapter Two has begun
- Adam Balan Home to: BLACKANDWHITE, Games and Labs
- Stalk me on Twitter
- Forums: RRR
#43
Posted 11 January 2012 - 03:24 PM
#44
Posted 11 January 2012 - 07:17 PM
Instead why don't you try to make arguments, convincing arguments, that he was deep, developed and interesting. I'd love to have a good
- ShinGamix likes this
#45
Posted 11 January 2012 - 07:38 PM
Edited by Knightmare, 11 January 2012 - 07:40 PM.
Chuck Norris facts and RPG Maker.
Maze of the Lost Progress
#46
Posted 11 January 2012 - 09:20 PM
FFIII (Yes, III because I bought it the day it came out and it was III here) is tied for all time best RPG with Chrono Trigger in my eyes and probably always will be. Some may say that it is pure nostalgia, but I don't think so.
Going back and playing these games still provides a lot of enjoyment for me. The storyline in FFII is great; it's deep and they managed to fill out a *ton* of characters well. My only gripe would be that the end half (i.e., second world) was a little less linear than I would have liked, but still, each scenario does a good job developing its character(s).
Dear BigEd,
I know we have rarely seen eye to eye on any issue but
HELL FREAKING YEA!!
I feel the same exact way. I cannot believe it.
YOU are #1 in my book now BigEd!!!
I am a BigEd781 Fanboy!
oh and hi Pine. Haven't seen you too much here yet.
Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars is a close third and forth is FFIX. Fifth is Final Fantasy Tactics and sixth is a tie between Secret Mana and FFVII.
oh no Touchfuzzy! You didn't really say all that about FF6 did you? yep. crap.
-100 cool points. My response to that. I will put in a spoiler just to help keep the clutter down some.
oh +101 cool points to TouchFuzzy for you saying FFT is the coolest game ever with the Final Fantasy name on it. I can agree that that. Since Advanced has a sequel can we have a tactics sequel some year!?!
Still Chrono Trigger is better than any of the FF series. besides Tactics because Tactics is a tactical game and I can't stay away from my Red Chocobo! Meteor! Move two steps up. Face North. Oh and archer shot my bird....
Dam now I have to go play Tactics, but it had the worst ending ever and the end boss sucked.
Edited by ShinGamix, 11 January 2012 - 09:25 PM.
#47
Posted 11 January 2012 - 09:24 PM
- Triggerhound777 likes this
#48
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:51 AM
in FF6, I have "That Guy" as one of the legitimate villains, and it's pretty much how I'd imagine things would turn out
so during the time I've built up my teams and have them deal four-digit damage on him per swing... goddamn that felt gooooooooooood!!!!!!
- killer bon bon and ShinGamix like this
The Legend of Seamus
Or, the exploites and tryals of a true-bloded errante of Clishea
And also...
khaaaaaaaaaaan!
#49
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:15 AM
He does a number on the world and leaves it in ruins. yeah I've played 7 til the end. I've played every main Final Fantasy entry minus the real Final Fantasy 3.
I'm a big gamer and most of my favorites were from snes to ps1. Here's what I think FF6 did right.
1. The plot may have not been revolutionary, but it is certainly better than any crap released in the last 5 years.
2. The segments when the story splits up the characters gives you more of a bond with your party members.
3. Every character had some unique skill to differentiate them from one another.
4. Kefka was a crazy villain who starts off as a bit of comic relief, then ends up poisoning a water supply for people, killing his own General, destroying villages behind the Emperor's back, killing the Emperor, sucking the life out of every Esper he could get, and becomes a God...yeah sounds like a terrible villain to me. This villain started the "Angel of Death" tradition in Final Fantasy bosses.
5. The music. Square couldn't have done a better job with the hardware they were working with.
6. Side characters, while not having any development were nice to have. Even they had their own unique skills and/or traits.
7. Ultros the octopus was a fun distraction through the game, providing some cheesy humor to the otherwise dark tone of the game.
And for the record, I played VII before VI. I just find VI to be a better game overall...and Tactics was great. Just not the crappy gba/ds versions x.x
Okay you can call me a fanboy now, try to prove me wrong, etc.
P.s. Seiken Densetsu 3 was a great game too for those that have played it.
Edited by Triggerhound777, 15 February 2012 - 02:42 AM.
#50
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:26 AM
#51
Posted 17 February 2012 - 04:48 PM
I thought kefka was a great villain. he was crazy. When the story seemed to be coming to a somewhat peaceful point he turns around and kills the emperor to take his place and become a god.
He does a number on the world and leaves it in ruins. yeah I've played 7 til the end. I've played every main Final Fantasy entry minus the real Final Fantasy 3.
I'm a big gamer and most of my favorites were from snes to ps1. Here's what I think FF6 did right.
1. The plot may have not been revolutionary, but it is certainly better than any crap released in the last 5 years.
2. The segments when the story splits up the characters gives you more of a bond with your party members.
3. Every character had some unique skill to differentiate them from one another.
4. Kefka was a crazy villain who starts off as a bit of comic relief, then ends up poisoning a water supply for people, killing his own General, destroying villages behind the Emperor's back, killing the Emperor, sucking the life out of every Esper he could get, and becomes a God...yeah sounds like a terrible villain to me. This villain started the "Angel of Death" tradition in Final Fantasy bosses.
5. The music. Square couldn't have done a better job with the hardware they were working with.
6. Side characters, while not having any development were nice to have. Even they had their own unique skills and/or traits.
7. Ultros the octopus was a fun distraction through the game, providing some cheesy humor to the otherwise dark tone of the game.
And for the record, I played VII before VI. I just find VI to be a better game overall...and Tactics was great. Just not the crappy gba/ds versions x.x
Okay you can call me a fanboy now, try to prove me wrong, etc.
P.s. Seiken Densetsu 3 was a great game too for those that have played it.
I can't agree more with this post, Kefka for starters is, in my opinion, one of the best villains because of his rise of power throughout the game. He might be inherently evil but I found him more engaging than most as well, from the little things like getting sand in his boots. Also, I find it shocking that you are the first person to mention the Music Triggerhound, all the pieces are wonderfully made and fit well in the places they are used (although the opera bit rubs me the wrong way a bit if I'm honest) - I actually still listen to the OST very often to this day.
P.s. Seiken Densetsu 2: Secret of Mana > Seiken Densetsu 3
#52
Posted 22 February 2012 - 10:18 AM
If you could get past the beginning, then it picked up a little. Perhaps the "fake last dungeon" (when kefka rises to power) was my favorite area of the game. After that, it's pretty much the beginning again. Go around collecting characters. Except you can do it in any order, I guess.
And the whole team thingy ruined the last dungeon for me (the player isn't encouraged at all to raise another set of characters before that, so the common player has to do the dungeon like three times, having their main party run through every path).
The Esper system was nice, though. But I found the selection of attacks in end-game to be severely limited. All other attacks pale in comparison of double ultima and, furthermore, quadruple slash with the ultimate weapons.
Edited by Greensburg, 22 February 2012 - 10:20 AM.
#53
Posted 22 February 2012 - 01:47 PM
Hey guys, just a heads up. Anyone qualifying Kefka as "good" is instantly a FFVI fanboy and as such, they're not suitable to talk about FFVI. Please, don't try to justify its poor development and 2-dimensional proportions, it seriously makes you look bad. Instead why don't you try to make arguments, convincing arguments, that he was deep, developed and interesting. I'd love to have a good
laughread with such statements
I agree that Kefka was not a "deep" character, but that's really not the point of this game. FFVI revolves around the group and their stories. Yes, there is a villain and an impending doom, but the designers (I have to believe) intended the story to revolve around the good guys, and I think they did a wonderful job with that. It is all about their stories and how they came together to stop this madman. The reason behind his madness is not necessarily important and, in real life, there is not always a reason. Some people are just power hungry sociopaths. They focused on the group and I haven't played a game that has come close to the amount of character development that FFVI has.
- killer bon bon, Twistificent and Triggerhound777 like this
While sloppy writing does not invariably mean sloppy thinking, we've generally found the correlation to be strong -- and we have no use for sloppy thinkers. If you can't yet write competently, learn to. - Eric Raymond
#54
Posted 22 February 2012 - 09:49 PM
But the point of my post isn't about the characters, which I'll say 40% of them were good, 20% were awesome and the rest are at different ranks on my list. My point is that, what so many little jerks are saying right here is false. Kefka is awful awful and to say he's even slightly good is saying nonsense out of nostalgic feelings. So is justifying him.
#55
Posted 23 February 2012 - 05:07 AM
kefka reminds me of those awful d&d players who would lolrandom and ruin the campaign with their silly antics, we call him "That Guy"
in FF6, I have "That Guy" as one of the legitimate villains, and it's pretty much how I'd imagine things would turn out
so during the time I've built up my teams and have them deal four-digit damage on him per swing... goddamn that felt gooooooooooood!!!!!!
You are so right.
Kefka is what happens when you let "That Guy" run the campaign. Complete disaster, but it was really fun to make him cry when we ruined his fun for once.
#56
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:51 AM
#59
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:36 AM
#60
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:09 PM
Forum Creeper v1.5.7
I speak my mind based on whats relevant to me.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

















